|
New Scientist Editorial Errors
I like the New Scientist
web site; I visit it often, and enjoy their articles. However, they have quite a
high rate of editorial errors – grammar, punctuation, typos, etc. – the
sort of things an editor is supposed to catch. They apparently don't care about it,
as I've emailed them three times and received no response.
I first started tracking these errors in September 2002, and as of September 2008
have recorded 120. 20 per year may not seem like a lot, but it's unacceptable for
a professional publication, and some of them are exceptionally sloppy. I also
don't read every article, so there are likely more. I don't mean to pick on NS,
but sloppiness bugs me, especially indifferent sloppiness. So, for the record,
here they are:
|